qed: qed_dev: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e77f02b812
commit
53a42286f2
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -1789,14 +1789,14 @@ int qed_hw_init(struct qed_dev *cdev, struct qed_hw_init_params *p_params)
|
|||
p_hwfn->hw_info.hw_mode);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* Fall into */
|
||||
/* Fall through */
|
||||
case FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_PORT:
|
||||
rc = qed_hw_init_port(p_hwfn, p_hwfn->p_main_ptt,
|
||||
p_hwfn->hw_info.hw_mode);
|
||||
if (rc)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fall into */
|
||||
/* Fall through */
|
||||
case FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_FUNCTION:
|
||||
rc = qed_hw_init_pf(p_hwfn, p_hwfn->p_main_ptt,
|
||||
p_params->p_tunn,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue