Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2020-07-31
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 5 non-merge commits during the last 21 day(s) which contain
a total of 5 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix a map element leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map type, from Andrii Nakryiko.
2) Fix a NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id() when no
btf_vmlinux is available, from Peilin Ye.
3) Init pos variable in __bpfilter_process_sockopt(), from Christoph Hellwig.
4) Fix a cgroup sockopt verifier test by specifying expected attach type,
from Jean-Philippe Brucker.
Note that when net gets merged into net-next later on, there is a small
merge conflict in kernel/bpf/btf.c between commit 5b801dfb7f ("bpf: Fix
NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id()") from the bpf tree
and commit 138b9a0511 ("bpf: Remove btf_id helpers resolving") from the
net-next tree.
Resolve as follows: remove the old hunk with the __btf_resolve_helper_id()
function. Change the btf_resolve_helper_id() so it actually tests for a
NULL btf_vmlinux and bails out:
int btf_resolve_helper_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
const struct bpf_func_proto *fn, int arg)
{
int id;
if (fn->arg_type[arg] != ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID || !btf_vmlinux)
return -EINVAL;
id = fn->btf_id[arg];
if (!id || id > btf_vmlinux->nr_types)
return -EINVAL;
return id;
}
Let me know if you run into any others issues (CC'ing Jiri Olsa so he's in
the loop with regards to merge conflict resolution).
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
==================
BPF Selftest Notes
==================
General instructions on running selftests can be found in
`Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_.
Additional information about selftest failures are
documented here.
bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0
=============================================
With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed:
* ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route``
* ``bpf_iter/netlink``
The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like
.. code-block:: c
2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
...
14: (bf) r2 = r8
15: (0f) r2 += r1
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen);
16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2
only read is supported
The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like
.. code-block:: c
; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk;
2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)
...
15: (bf) r2 = r7
16: (0f) r2 += r1
; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol);
17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2
only read is supported
This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix
https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466
has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be
available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk.
69138b34a7