We dont want to try re-adding people that get removed manually.
Otherwise you start fighting CI.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Currently, we send all files as a list but it can be problematic with
files that can't be evaluated properly. Instead of crashing the entire
extraction process, we will send a file at a time for eval so we can
just bypass files causing issues.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Break the workflow into multiple scripts to make it easier to test /
maintain. Also fix the remove reviewer process to not review reviews
from people that were manually requested.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Simplify extraction and generation of file. We dont need the comments
and can leverage the appropriate lib.generator function.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Previously, we had to hack together some string matching to identify and
retrieve the maintainers in the repo. We can just eval the modules to
retrieve the list of maintainers more accurately.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Create a script for generating the master maintainer list we will use
for inviting / pinging on changed files.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
