Don't need to encourage triaging git history to bother people who
haven't opted to maintain a module.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We have moved towards running more tests on buildbot for better
performance. Don't duplicate efforts on github actions.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We have lots of tests and would like to add more. However, adding more
testing coverage comes at the cost of a slower CI when we run them
sequentially. This adds test outputs that are chunked however we'd like
to tune for batch sizes. Allowing us to create a parallelized CI
workflow.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Break the workflow into multiple scripts to make it easier to test /
maintain. Also fix the remove reviewer process to not review reviews
from people that were manually requested.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Better support updating existing PRs and summary of changes in workflow
summary. Tested in nixvim.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Needless spam and doesn't really make sense to default to repo
maintainers. Also, clearly hasn't been utilized for a long time.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Make a more detailed form for filing a feature request. This will help
steer users towards more helpful feature requests, similar to our bug
reporting.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We dont want need to maintain duplicate entries for maintainers in HM
that already exist in Nixpkgs. Add a check that calls out users that
don't need an entry in our internal list.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We just need to run it once properly and dont need to keep running it
for every push until the last.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We want to ping maintainers whenever files are affected. Right now it
requires changing a PR to a draft and reopening, but we should be more
clever and request the review whenever the file is updated.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Was relying on flawed logic and fragile parsing to identify maintainers
on changed files. Rework to use nix eval to grab the `meta.maintainers`
to use when requesting a review.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Previously, we had to hack together some string matching to identify and
retrieve the maintainers in the repo. We can just eval the modules to
retrieve the list of maintainers more accurately.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Cancel existing runs when a new push happens so we don't unnecessarily
run jobs that are irrelevant.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
We need to make sure that we don't insert invalid maintainers otherwise
it breaks the RFC39 invite workflow. Check that we have valid nix and
the required attributes are able to be parsed properly.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
Want to create an easier way to notify maintainers that someone is
working on their module. Added a workflow for requesting a review from any maintainers that have joined the `home-manager-maintainers` team in the organization.
Signed-off-by: Austin Horstman <khaneliman12@gmail.com>
