mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nix.git
synced 2025-11-09 20:16:03 +01:00
DerivationGoal inline gaveUpOnSubstitution lambda
We can shuffle around control flow so it's only called once. You'll definitely want to review this diff ignoring whitespace.
This commit is contained in:
parent
88275e5723
commit
14441f9382
1 changed files with 98 additions and 105 deletions
|
|
@ -75,62 +75,19 @@ Goal::Co DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
|
||||||
if (!drv->type().hasKnownOutputPaths())
|
if (!drv->type().hasKnownOutputPaths())
|
||||||
experimentalFeatureSettings.require(Xp::CaDerivations);
|
experimentalFeatureSettings.require(Xp::CaDerivations);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* At least one of the output paths could not be
|
|
||||||
produced using a substitute. So we have to build instead. */
|
|
||||||
auto gaveUpOnSubstitution = [&]() -> Goal::Co {
|
|
||||||
auto g = worker.makeDerivationBuildingGoal(drvPath, *drv, buildMode);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* We will finish with it ourselves, as if we were the derivational goal. */
|
|
||||||
g->preserveException = true;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
Goals waitees;
|
|
||||||
waitees.insert(g);
|
|
||||||
co_await await(std::move(waitees));
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
trace("outer build done");
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
buildResult = g->buildResult;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (buildMode == bmCheck) {
|
|
||||||
/* In checking mode, the builder will not register any outputs.
|
|
||||||
So we want to make sure the ones that we wanted to check are
|
|
||||||
properly there. */
|
|
||||||
buildResult.builtOutputs = {{wantedOutput, assertPathValidity()}};
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (auto it = buildResult.builtOutputs.begin(); it != buildResult.builtOutputs.end();) {
|
|
||||||
if (it->first != wantedOutput) {
|
|
||||||
it = buildResult.builtOutputs.erase(it);
|
|
||||||
} else {
|
|
||||||
++it;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (buildResult.success())
|
|
||||||
assert(buildResult.builtOutputs.count(wantedOutput) > 0);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
co_return amDone(g->exitCode, g->ex);
|
|
||||||
};
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (auto & i : drv->outputsAndOptPaths(worker.store))
|
for (auto & i : drv->outputsAndOptPaths(worker.store))
|
||||||
if (i.second.second)
|
if (i.second.second)
|
||||||
worker.store.addTempRoot(*i.second.second);
|
worker.store.addTempRoot(*i.second.second);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
if (auto * mOutputHash = get(staticOutputHashes(worker.evalStore, *drv), wantedOutput)) {
|
if (auto * mOutputHash = get(staticOutputHashes(worker.evalStore, *drv), wantedOutput)) {
|
||||||
outputHash = *mOutputHash;
|
outputHash = *mOutputHash;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (drv->type().isImpure()) {
|
|
||||||
experimentalFeatureSettings.require(Xp::ImpureDerivations);
|
|
||||||
/* We don't yet have any safe way to cache an impure derivation at
|
/* We don't yet have any safe way to cache an impure derivation at
|
||||||
this step. */
|
this step. */
|
||||||
co_return gaveUpOnSubstitution();
|
if (drv->type().isImpure()) {
|
||||||
}
|
experimentalFeatureSettings.require(Xp::ImpureDerivations);
|
||||||
}
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Check what outputs paths are not already valid. */
|
/* Check what outputs paths are not already valid. */
|
||||||
auto checkResult = checkPathValidity();
|
auto checkResult = checkPathValidity();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -186,10 +143,46 @@ Goal::Co DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if (buildMode == bmCheck && !allValid)
|
if (buildMode == bmCheck && !allValid)
|
||||||
throw Error(
|
throw Error(
|
||||||
"some outputs of '%s' are not valid, so checking is not possible", worker.store.printStorePath(drvPath));
|
"some outputs of '%s' are not valid, so checking is not possible",
|
||||||
|
worker.store.printStorePath(drvPath));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Nothing to wait for; tail call */
|
/* Give up on substitution for the output we want, actually build this derivation */
|
||||||
co_return gaveUpOnSubstitution();
|
|
||||||
|
auto g = worker.makeDerivationBuildingGoal(drvPath, *drv, buildMode);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* We will finish with it ourselves, as if we were the derivational goal. */
|
||||||
|
g->preserveException = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
Goals waitees;
|
||||||
|
waitees.insert(g);
|
||||||
|
co_await await(std::move(waitees));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
trace("outer build done");
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
buildResult = g->buildResult;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (buildMode == bmCheck) {
|
||||||
|
/* In checking mode, the builder will not register any outputs.
|
||||||
|
So we want to make sure the ones that we wanted to check are
|
||||||
|
properly there. */
|
||||||
|
buildResult.builtOutputs = {{wantedOutput, assertPathValidity()}};
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for (auto it = buildResult.builtOutputs.begin(); it != buildResult.builtOutputs.end();) {
|
||||||
|
if (it->first != wantedOutput) {
|
||||||
|
it = buildResult.builtOutputs.erase(it);
|
||||||
|
} else {
|
||||||
|
++it;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (buildResult.success())
|
||||||
|
assert(buildResult.builtOutputs.count(wantedOutput) > 0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
co_return amDone(g->exitCode, g->ex);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue