mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/nix.git
synced 2025-11-16 07:22:43 +01:00
Use XZ compression in binary caches
XZ compresses significantly better than bzip2. Here are the compression ratios and execution times (using 4 cores in parallel) on my /var/run/current-system (3.1 GiB): bzip2: total compressed size 849.56 MiB, 30.8% [2m08] xz -6: total compressed size 641.84 MiB, 23.4% [6m53] xz -7: total compressed size 621.82 MiB, 22.6% [7m19] xz -8: total compressed size 599.33 MiB, 21.8% [7m18] xz -9: total compressed size 588.18 MiB, 21.4% [7m40] Note that compression takes much longer. More importantly, however, decompression is much faster: bzip2: 1m47.274s xz -6: 0m55.446s xz -7: 0m54.119s xz -8: 0m52.388s xz -9: 0m51.842s The only downside to using -9 is that decompression takes a fair amount (~65 MB) of memory.
This commit is contained in:
parent
49cd7387ad
commit
4911a10a4e
6 changed files with 24 additions and 19 deletions
|
|
@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ NEED_PROG(perl, perl)
|
|||
NEED_PROG(sed, sed)
|
||||
NEED_PROG(tar, tar)
|
||||
NEED_PROG(bzip2, bzip2)
|
||||
NEED_PROG(xz, xz)
|
||||
AC_PATH_PROG(dot, dot)
|
||||
AC_PATH_PROG(dblatex, dblatex)
|
||||
AC_PATH_PROG(gzip, gzip)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue