Fix#11897
As described in the issue, this makes for a simpler and much more
intuitive notion of a realisation key. This is better for pedagogy, and
interoperability between more tools.
The way the issue was written was that we would switch to only having
shallow realisations first, and then do this. But going to only shallow
realisations is more complex change, and it turns out we weren't even
testing for the benefits that derivation hashes (modulo FODs) provided
in the deep realisation case, so I now just want to do this first.
Doing this gets the binary cache data structures in order, which will
unblock the Hydra fixed-output-derivation tracking work. I don't want to
delay that work while I figure out the changes needed for
shallow-realisations only.
This reverts commit bab1cda0e6.
Realisations are conceptually key-value pairs, mapping `DrvOutputs` (the
key) to information about that derivation output.
This separate the value type, which will be useful in maps, etc., where
we don't want to denormalize by including the key twice.
This matches similar changes for existing types:
| keyed | unkeyed |
|--------------------|------------------------|
| `ValidPathInfo` | `UnkeyedValidPathInfo` |
| `KeyedBuildResult` | `BuildResult` |
| `Realisation` | `UnkeyedRealisation` |
Co-authored-by: Sergei Zimmerman <sergei@zimmerman.foo>
Realisations are conceptually key-value pairs, mapping `DrvOutputs` (the
key) to information about that derivation output.
This separate the value type, which will be useful in maps, etc., where
we don't want to denormalize by including the key twice.
This matches similar changes for existing types:
| keyed | unkeyed |
|--------------------|------------------------|
| `ValidPathInfo` | `UnkeyedValidPathInfo` |
| `KeyedBuildResult` | `BuildResult` |
| `Realisation` | `UnkeyedRealisation` |
Old code is now just used for `nix build` --- there is no CLI breaking
change.
Test the new format, too.
The new format is not currently used, but will be used going forward,
for example in the C API.
Progress on #13570
* It is tough to contribute to a project that doesn't use a formatter,
* It is extra hard to contribute to a project which has configured the formatter, but ignores it for some files
* Code formatting makes it harder to hide obscure / weird bugs by accident or on purpose,
Let's rip the bandaid off?
Note that PRs currently in flight should be able to be merged relatively easily by applying `clang-format` to their tip prior to merge.
For example, instead of doing
#include "nix/store-config.hh"
#include "nix/derived-path.hh"
Now do
#include "nix/store/config.hh"
#include "nix/store/derived-path.hh"
This was originally planned in the issue, and also recent requested by
Eelco.
Most of the change is purely mechanical. There is just one small
additional issue. See how, in the example above, we took this
opportunity to also turn `<comp>-config.hh` into `<comp>/config.hh`.
Well, there was already a `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`. Even though there
is not a public configuration header for libutil (which also would be
called `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`) that's still confusing, To avoid any
such confusion, we renamed that to `nix/util/configuration.{cc,hh}`.
Finally, note that the libflake headers already did this, so we didn't
need to do anything to them. We wouldn't want to mistakenly get
`nix/flake/flake/flake.hh`!
Progress on #7876
The short answer for why we need to do this is so we can consistently do
`#include "nix/..."`. Without this change, there are ways to still make
that work, but they are hacky, and they have downsides such as making it
harder to make sure headers from the wrong Nix library (e..g.
`libnixexpr` headers in `libnixutil`) aren't being used.
The C API alraedy used `nix_api_*`, so its headers are *not* put in
subdirectories accordingly.
Progress on #7876
We resisted doing this for a while because it would be annoying to not
have the header source file pairs close by / easy to change file
path/name from one to the other. But I am ameliorating that with
symlinks in the next commit.
Known behavior changes:
- `MemorySourceAccessor`'s comparison operators no longer forget to
compare the `SourceAccessor` base class.
Progress on #10832
What remains for that issue is hopefully much easier!
as written the comparisons generate copies, even though it looks as
though they shouldn't.
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.396 s ± 0.002 s [User: 3.894 s, System: 0.501 s]
Range (min … max): 4.393 s … 4.399 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.260 s ± 0.003 s [User: 3.754 s, System: 0.505 s]
Range (min … max): 4.257 s … 4.266 s 10 runs
We use the same nested map representation we used for goals, again in
order to save space. We might someday want to combine with `inputDrvs`,
by doing `V = bool` instead of `V = std::set<OutputName>`, but we are
not doing that yet for sake of a smaller diff.
The ATerm format for Derivations also needs to be extended, in addition
to the in-memory format. To accomodate this, we added a new basic
versioning scheme, so old versions of Nix will get nice errors. (And
going forward, if the ATerm format changes again the errors will be even
better.)
`parsedStrings`, an internal function used as part of parsing
derivations in A-Term format, used to consume the final `]` but expect
the initial `[` to already be consumed. This made for what looked like
unbalanced brackets at callsites, which was confusing. Now it consumes
both which is hopefully less confusing.
As part of testing, we also created a unit test for the A-Term format for
regular non-experimental derivations too.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
We want to be able to write down `foo.drv^bar.drv^baz`:
`foo.drv^bar.drv` is the dynamic derivation (since it is itself a
derivation output, `bar.drv` from `foo.drv`).
To that end, we create `Single{Derivation,BuiltPath}` types, that are
very similar except instead of having multiple outputs (in a set or
map), they have a single one. This is for everything to the left of the
rightmost `^`.
`NixStringContextElem` has an analogous change, and now can reuse
`SingleDerivedPath` at the top level. In fact, if we ever get rid of
`DrvDeep`, `NixStringContextElem` could be replaced with
`SingleDerivedPath` entirely!
Important note: some JSON formats have changed.
We already can *produce* dynamic derivations, but we can't refer to them
directly. Today, we can merely express building or example at the top
imperatively over time by building `foo.drv^bar.drv`, and then with a
second nix invocation doing `<result-from-first>^baz`, but this is not
declarative. The ethos of Nix of being able to write down the full plan
everything you want to do, and then execute than plan with a single
command, and for that we need the new inductive form of these types.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
