`nix formatter build` is sort of like `nix build`: it builds, links, and
prints a path to the formatter program:
$ nix formatter build
/nix/store/cb9w44vkhk2x4adfxwgdkkf5gjmm856j-treefmt/bin/treefmt
Note that unlike `nix build`, this prints the full path to the program,
not just the store path (in the example above that would be
`/nix/store/cb9w44vkhk2x4adfxwgdkkf5gjmm856j-treefmt`).
Motivation
----------
I maintain a vim plugin that automatically runs `nix fmt` on files on
save. Since `nix fmt` can be quite slow due to nix evaluation, I choose
to cache the `nix fmt `entrypoint. This was very awkward to do, see the
implementation for details:
7864607231/lua/null-ls/builtins/formatting/nix_flake_fmt.lua (L83-L110).
I recently discovered that my implementation was buggy (it didn't handle
flakes that expose a `formatter` package, such as nixpkgs), so I had to
rework the implementation:
https://github.com/nvimtools/none-ls.nvim/pull/272.
With the new `nix formatter build` command, I can delete all this akward
code, and it will be easier for other folks to build performant editor
integrations for `nix fmt`.
This refactor shouldn't change much except add a new `nix formatter run`
command. This creates space for the new `nix formatter build` command,
which I'll be introducing in the next commit.
... by moving our stuff out of the way from upstream's
`nixComponents` and `nixDependencies` attrsets.
(I prefer not to use overlays, but let's make it work this way
first)
(cherry picked from commit b257ea94e3)
... by moving our stuff out of the way from upstream's
`nixComponents` and `nixDependencies` attrsets.
(I prefer not to use overlays, but let's make it work this way
first)
We had fields set to the same values before in our test data. This is
not a problem per-se, but does mean we wouldn't catch certain mixups.
Now, the fields are set to distinct values (where possible), which makes
the test more robust.
(cherry picked from commit a0b2b75f59)
We had fields set to the same values before in our test data. This is
not a problem per-se, but does mean we wouldn't catch certain mixups.
Now, the fields are set to distinct values (where possible), which makes
the test more robust.
Now, both the unit and functional tests relating to derivation options
are tested both ways -- with input addressing and content-addressing
derivations.
(cherry picked from commit 307dbe9914)
This requires that we refer to the `sourceInfo` instead of the
`result`. However, `sourceInfo` does not create a chain of basedir
resolution, so we add that back with `flakeDir`.
(cherry picked from commit 2109a5a206)
This requires that we refer to the `sourceInfo` instead of the
`result`. However, `sourceInfo` does not create a chain of basedir
resolution, so we add that back with `flakeDir`.
Now, both the unit and functional tests relating to derivation options
are tested both ways -- with input addressing and content-addressing
derivations.
