The previous message was vague about what "deprecated" meant and why
unlocked inputs with NAR hashes "may not be reproducible". It also
used "verifiable" which was confusing.
The new message makes it clear that the NAR hash provides verification
(is checked by NAR hash) and explicitly states the failure modes:
garbage collection and sharing.
* It is tough to contribute to a project that doesn't use a formatter,
* It is extra hard to contribute to a project which has configured the formatter, but ignores it for some files
* Code formatting makes it harder to hide obscure / weird bugs by accident or on purpose,
Let's rip the bandaid off?
Note that PRs currently in flight should be able to be merged relatively easily by applying `clang-format` to their tip prior to merge.
