We only care about the accessor for a single store object anyway, but
the validity gets ignored. Also `pathExists(store.printStorePath(path))`
is definitely incorrect since it confuses the logical location vs physical
location in case of a chroot store.
The refactor in the last commit fixed the bug it was supposed to fix,
but introduced a new bug in that sometimes we tried to write a resolved
derivation to a store before all its `inputSrcs` were in that store.
The solution is to defer writing the derivation until inside
`DerivationBuildingGoal`, just before we do an actual build. At this
point, we are sure that all inputs in are the store.
This does have the side effect of meaning we don't write down the
resolved derivation in the substituting case, only the building case,
but I think that is actually fine. The store that actually does the
building should make a record of what it built by storing the resolved
derivation. Other stores that just substitute from that store don't
necessary want that derivation however. They can trust the substituter
to keep the record around, or baring that, they can attempt to re
resolve everything, if they need to be audited.
(cherry picked from commit c97b050a6c)
The refactor in the last commit fixed the bug it was supposed to fix,
but introduced a new bug in that sometimes we tried to write a resolved
derivation to a store before all its `inputSrcs` were in that store.
The solution is to defer writing the derivation until inside
`DerivationBuildingGoal`, just before we do an actual build. At this
point, we are sure that all inputs in are the store.
This does have the side effect of meaning we don't write down the
resolved derivation in the substituting case, only the building case,
but I think that is actually fine. The store that actually does the
building should make a record of what it built by storing the resolved
derivation. Other stores that just substitute from that store don't
necessary want that derivation however. They can trust the substituter
to keep the record around, or baring that, they can attempt to re
resolve everything, if they need to be audited.
This is needed to rearrange include order, but I also think it is a good
thing anyways, as we seek to reduce the use of global settings variables
over time.
* It is tough to contribute to a project that doesn't use a formatter,
* It is extra hard to contribute to a project which has configured the formatter, but ignores it for some files
* Code formatting makes it harder to hide obscure / weird bugs by accident or on purpose,
Let's rip the bandaid off?
Note that PRs currently in flight should be able to be merged relatively easily by applying `clang-format` to their tip prior to merge.
The use of R"(...)" added a bunch of unnecessary whitespace, e.g.
error:
Unable to start any build;
either increase '--max-jobs' or enable remote builds.
For more information run 'man nix.conf' and search for '/machines'.
Now we get
error: Unable to start any build; either increase '--max-jobs' or enable remote builds.
For more information run 'man nix.conf' and search for '/machines'.
This is just a code cleanup; it should not be behavior change.
`addWantedOutputs` is removed by introducing `DerivationTrampolineGoal`.
`DerivationGoal` now only tracks a single output, and is back to
tracking a plain store path `drvPath`, not a deriving path one. Its
`addWantedOutputs` method is gone. These changes will allow subsequent
PRs to simplify it greatly.
Because the purpose of each goal is back to being immutable, we can also
once again make `Goal::buildResult` a public field, and get rid of the
`getBuildResult` method. This simplifies things also.
`DerivationTrampolineGoal` is, as the nane is supposed to indicate, a
cheap "trampoline" goal. It takes immutable sets of wanted outputs, and
just kicks of `DerivationGoal`s for them. Since now "actual work" is
done in these goals, it is not wasteful to have separate ones for
separate sets of outputs, even if those outputs (and the derivations
they are from) overlap.
This design is described in more detail in the doc comments on the goal
types, which I've now greatly expanded.
---
This separation of concerns will make it possible for future work on
issues like #11928, and to continue the path of having more goal types,
but each goal type does fewer things (issue #12628).
---
This commit in some sense reverts
f4f28cdd0e, but that one kept around
`addWantedOutputs`. I am quite sure it was having two layers of goals
with `addWantedOutputs` that caused the issues --- restarting logic like
`addWantedOutputs` has is very tempermental! In this version of the
change, we have *zero* layers of `addWantedOutputs` --- no goal type
needs it, or otherwise has a mutable objective --- and so I think this
change is safe.
Co-authored-by: Sergei Zimmerman <145775305+xokdvium@users.noreply.github.com>
This method does *not* create a new type of goal. We instead just make
`DerivationGoal` more sophisticated, which is much easier to do now that
`DerivationBuildingGoal` has been split from it (and so many fields are
gone, or or local variables instead).
This avoids the need for a secondarily trampoline goal that interacted
poorly with `addWantedOutputs`. That, I hope, will mean the bugs from
before do not reappear.
There may in fact be a reason to introduce such a trampoline in the
future, but it would only happen in conjunction with getting rid of
`addWantedOutputs`.
Restores the functionality (and tests) that was reverted in
f4f28cdd0e.
I split it out before to try to separate the building logic, but now we
have the much better `DerivationBuilder` abstraction for that. With that
change, I think `LocalDerivationGoal` has outlived its usefulness.
We just inline it back into `DerivationGoal`, and do so with minimal
`#ifdef` for Windows.
Note that the order of statements in `~DerivationGoal` is different than
it was after the `~LocalDerivationGoal` split, but it is *restored* to
the way it original was before --- evidently I did the split slightly
wrong, but nobody noticed, probably because the order doesn't actually
matter.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Rather than "mounting" the store inside an empty virtual filesystem,
just return the store as a virtual filesystem. This is more modular.
(FWIW, it also supports two long term hopes of mind:
1. More capability-based Nix language mode. I dream of a "super pure
eval" where you can only use relative path literals (See #8738), and
any `fetchTree`-fetched stuff + the store are all disjoint (none is
mounted in another) file systems.
2. Windows, where the store dir may include drive letters, etc., and is
thus unsuitable to be the prefix of any `CanonPath`s.
)
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
For example, instead of doing
#include "nix/store-config.hh"
#include "nix/derived-path.hh"
Now do
#include "nix/store/config.hh"
#include "nix/store/derived-path.hh"
This was originally planned in the issue, and also recent requested by
Eelco.
Most of the change is purely mechanical. There is just one small
additional issue. See how, in the example above, we took this
opportunity to also turn `<comp>-config.hh` into `<comp>/config.hh`.
Well, there was already a `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`. Even though there
is not a public configuration header for libutil (which also would be
called `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`) that's still confusing, To avoid any
such confusion, we renamed that to `nix/util/configuration.{cc,hh}`.
Finally, note that the libflake headers already did this, so we didn't
need to do anything to them. We wouldn't want to mistakenly get
`nix/flake/flake/flake.hh`!
Progress on #7876
The short answer for why we need to do this is so we can consistently do
`#include "nix/..."`. Without this change, there are ways to still make
that work, but they are hacky, and they have downsides such as making it
harder to make sure headers from the wrong Nix library (e..g.
`libnixexpr` headers in `libnixutil`) aren't being used.
The C API alraedy used `nix_api_*`, so its headers are *not* put in
subdirectories accordingly.
Progress on #7876
We resisted doing this for a while because it would be annoying to not
have the header source file pairs close by / easy to change file
path/name from one to the other. But I am ameliorating that with
symlinks in the next commit.
I refactored the way that input resolution works in `DerivationGoal`. To
be honest, it is probably unclear to the reader whether this new way is
better or worse. I suppose *intrinsic* motivation, I can say that
- the more structured use of `inputGoal` (a local variable) is better
than the shotgrun approach with `inputDrvOutputs`
- A virtual `waiteeDone` was a hack, and now it's gone.
However, the *real* motivation of this is not the above things, but that
it is needed for my mammoth refactor fixing #11897 and #11928.
It is nice that this step could come first, rather than making that
refactor even bigger.
The bug reappeared after all, and the fix introduced a different bug. I
just reverted on 2.27 first, in #12576, but upon further introspection
and discussion with @roberth, with preparing for and travelling to
Planet Nix I will not be able to fix it on `master` soon enough for a
revert to not be warranted here in the meantime also.
This reverts commit c98525235f.
This fixes dynamic derivations, reverting #9081.
I believe that this time around, #9052 is fixed. When I first rebased
this, tests were failing (which wasn't the case before). The cause of
those test failures were due to the crude job in which the outer goal
tried to exit with the inner goal's status.
Now, that error handling has been reworked to be more faithful. The exit
exit status and exception of the inner goal is returned by the outer
goal. The exception was what was causing the test failures, but I
believe it was not having the right error code (there is more than one
for failure) that caused #9081.
The only cost of doing things the "right way" was that I had to
introduce a hacky `preserveException` boolean. I don't like this, but,
then again, none of us like anything about how the scheduler works.
Issue #11927 is still there to clean everything up, subsuming the need
for any `preserveException` because I doubt we will be fishing
information out of state machines like this at all.
This reverts commit 8440afbed7.
Co-Authored-By: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
- Get a rump derivation goal: hook instance will come later, local
derivation goal will come after that.
- Start cleaning up the channel / waiting code with an abstraction.
Building derivations is a lot harder, but the downloading goals is
portable enough.
The "common channel" code is due to Volth. I wonder if there is a way we
can factor it out into separate functions / files to avoid some
within-function CPP.
Co-authored-by: volth <volth@volth.com>
At this point many features are stripped out, but this works:
- Can run libnix{util,store,expr} unit tests
- Can run some Nix commands
Co-Authored-By volth <volth@volth.com>
Co-Authored-By Brian McKenna <brian@brianmckenna.org>
Part of RFC 133
Extracted from our old IPFS branches.
Co-Authored-By: Matthew Bauer <mjbauer95@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Carlo Nucera <carlo.nucera@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Klink <flokli@flokli.de>
- move all reference documentation to the `builders` configuration setting
- reword documentation on machine specification, add examples
- disable showing the default value, as it rendered as `@/dummy/machines`, which is wrong
- highlight the examples
- link to the configuration docs for distributed builds
- builder -> build machine
Co-authored-by: Janik H <janik@aq0.de>
The data was (accidentally?) copied into a std::string,
even though the string is immediately converted into a std::string_view.
The code has been changed to construct a std::string_view directly,
such that one copy less happens.
All OS and IO operations should be moved out, leaving only some misc
portable pure functions.
This is useful to avoid copious CPP when doing things like Windows and
Emscripten ports.
Newly exposed functions to break cycles:
- `restoreSignals`
- `updateWindowSize`
This reverts commit 5e3986f59c. This
un-implements RFC 92 but fixes the critical bug #9052 which many people
are hitting. This is a decent stop-gap until a minimal reproduction of
that bug is found and a proper fix can be made.
Mostly fixed#9052, but I would like to leave that issue open until we
have a regression test, so I can then properly fix the bug (unbreaking
RFC 92) later.
We use the same nested map representation we used for goals, again in
order to save space. We might someday want to combine with `inputDrvs`,
by doing `V = bool` instead of `V = std::set<OutputName>`, but we are
not doing that yet for sake of a smaller diff.
The ATerm format for Derivations also needs to be extended, in addition
to the in-memory format. To accomodate this, we added a new basic
versioning scheme, so old versions of Nix will get nice errors. (And
going forward, if the ATerm format changes again the errors will be even
better.)
`parsedStrings`, an internal function used as part of parsing
derivations in A-Term format, used to consume the final `]` but expect
the initial `[` to already be consumed. This made for what looked like
unbalanced brackets at callsites, which was confusing. Now it consumes
both which is hopefully less confusing.
As part of testing, we also created a unit test for the A-Term format for
regular non-experimental derivations too.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
To avoid dealing with an optional `drvPath` (because we might not know
it yet) everywhere, make an `CreateDerivationAndRealiseGoal`. This goal
just builds/substitutes the derivation file, and then kicks of a build
for that obtained derivation; in other words it does the chaining of
goals when the drv file is missing (as can already be the case) or
computed (new case).
This also means the `getDerivation` state can be removed from
`DerivationGoal`, which makes the `BasicDerivation` / in memory case and
`Derivation` / drv file file case closer together.
The map type is factored out for clarity, and because we will soon hvae
a second use for it (`Derivation` itself).
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Types converted:
- `NixStringContextElem`
- `OutputsSpec`
- `ExtendedOutputsSpec`
- `DerivationOutput`
- `DerivationType`
Existing ones mostly conforming the pattern cleaned up:
- `ContentAddressMethod`
- `ContentAddressWithReferences`
The `DerivationGoal::derivationType` field had a bogus initialization,
now caught, so I made it `std::optional`. I think #8829 can make it
non-optional again because it will ensure we always have the derivation
when we construct a `DerivationGoal`.
See that issue (#7479) for details on the general goal.
`git grep 'Raw::Raw'` indicates the two types I didn't yet convert
`DerivedPath` and `BuiltPath` (and their `Single` variants) . This is
because @roberth and I (can't find issue right now...) plan on reworking
them somewhat, so I didn't want to churn them more just yet.
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
We want to be able to write down `foo.drv^bar.drv^baz`:
`foo.drv^bar.drv` is the dynamic derivation (since it is itself a
derivation output, `bar.drv` from `foo.drv`).
To that end, we create `Single{Derivation,BuiltPath}` types, that are
very similar except instead of having multiple outputs (in a set or
map), they have a single one. This is for everything to the left of the
rightmost `^`.
`NixStringContextElem` has an analogous change, and now can reuse
`SingleDerivedPath` at the top level. In fact, if we ever get rid of
`DrvDeep`, `NixStringContextElem` could be replaced with
`SingleDerivedPath` entirely!
Important note: some JSON formats have changed.
We already can *produce* dynamic derivations, but we can't refer to them
directly. Today, we can merely express building or example at the top
imperatively over time by building `foo.drv^bar.drv`, and then with a
second nix invocation doing `<result-from-first>^baz`, but this is not
declarative. The ethos of Nix of being able to write down the full plan
everything you want to do, and then execute than plan with a single
command, and for that we need the new inductive form of these types.
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
- Improved API docs from comment
- Exit codes are for `nix-build`, not just `nix-store --release`
- Make note in tests so the magic numbers are not surprising
Picking up where #8387 left off.
