This will allow us to more accurately test dropping support for
dependent realisations, by separating the tests that should not change
from the tests that should.
I do that change in PR #14247, but even if for some reasons we don't end
up doing this soon, I think it is still good to separate the test data
this way so we have the option of doing that at some point.
Realisations are conceptually key-value pairs, mapping `DrvOutputs` (the
key) to information about that derivation output.
This separate the value type, which will be useful in maps, etc., where
we don't want to denormalize by including the key twice.
This matches similar changes for existing types:
| keyed | unkeyed |
|--------------------|------------------------|
| `ValidPathInfo` | `UnkeyedValidPathInfo` |
| `KeyedBuildResult` | `BuildResult` |
| `Realisation` | `UnkeyedRealisation` |
Co-authored-by: Sergei Zimmerman <sergei@zimmerman.foo>
Realisations are conceptually key-value pairs, mapping `DrvOutputs` (the
key) to information about that derivation output.
This separate the value type, which will be useful in maps, etc., where
we don't want to denormalize by including the key twice.
This matches similar changes for existing types:
| keyed | unkeyed |
|--------------------|------------------------|
| `ValidPathInfo` | `UnkeyedValidPathInfo` |
| `KeyedBuildResult` | `BuildResult` |
| `Realisation` | `UnkeyedRealisation` |
* It is tough to contribute to a project that doesn't use a formatter,
* It is extra hard to contribute to a project which has configured the formatter, but ignores it for some files
* Code formatting makes it harder to hide obscure / weird bugs by accident or on purpose,
Let's rip the bandaid off?
Note that PRs currently in flight should be able to be merged relatively easily by applying `clang-format` to their tip prior to merge.
The intention is to switch to transparent comparators from N3657 for
ordered set containers for strings and using the alias consistently
would simplify things.
For example, instead of doing
#include "nix/store-config.hh"
#include "nix/derived-path.hh"
Now do
#include "nix/store/config.hh"
#include "nix/store/derived-path.hh"
This was originally planned in the issue, and also recent requested by
Eelco.
Most of the change is purely mechanical. There is just one small
additional issue. See how, in the example above, we took this
opportunity to also turn `<comp>-config.hh` into `<comp>/config.hh`.
Well, there was already a `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`. Even though there
is not a public configuration header for libutil (which also would be
called `nix/util/config.{cc,hh}`) that's still confusing, To avoid any
such confusion, we renamed that to `nix/util/configuration.{cc,hh}`.
Finally, note that the libflake headers already did this, so we didn't
need to do anything to them. We wouldn't want to mistakenly get
`nix/flake/flake/flake.hh`!
Progress on #7876
The short answer for why we need to do this is so we can consistently do
`#include "nix/..."`. Without this change, there are ways to still make
that work, but they are hacky, and they have downsides such as making it
harder to make sure headers from the wrong Nix library (e..g.
`libnixexpr` headers in `libnixutil`) aren't being used.
The C API alraedy used `nix_api_*`, so its headers are *not* put in
subdirectories accordingly.
Progress on #7876
We resisted doing this for a while because it would be annoying to not
have the header source file pairs close by / easy to change file
path/name from one to the other. But I am ameliorating that with
symlinks in the next commit.
Unfortunately `StringSource` class is very easy was very easy to misuse
because the ctor took a plain `std::string_view` which has a bad habit
of being implicitly convertible from an rvalue `std::string`. This lead
to unintentional use-after-free bugs.
This patch makes `StringSource` much harder to misuse by disabling the ctor
from a `std::string &&` (but `const std::string &` is ok).
Fix affected tests from libstore-tests.
Reformat those tests with clangd's range formatting since the diff is tiny
and it seems appropriate.
