The explicit include is needed for clangd to not get confused somehow,
which is also what threw me off initially and made me pick the wrong
constructor.
The (pointer, number, number) constructor first constructs a C string
and then takes a substring from that, but we didn't specify that the
buffer needs to be NUL-terminated, and then what would be the point of
the size argument anyway...
basic_string.h:
> basic_string(const _Tp& __t, size_type __pos, size_type __n,
> const _Alloc& __a = _Alloc())
> : basic_string(_S_to_string_view(__t).substr(__pos, __n), __a) { }
Valgrind on nixops4/rust/nix-flake tests:
==1344422== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==1344422== at 0x48513E8: strlen (vg_replace_strmem.c:505)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (char_traits.h:391)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (string_view:141)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (basic_string.h:790)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: nix_flake_reference_and_fragment_from_string (nix_api_flake.cc:81)
==1344422== by 0x127332: nix_flake::FlakeReference::parse_with_fragment (lib.rs:123)
Once again found by an automated migration to `std::format`.
I've tested that boost::format works fine with `std::string_view`
arguments.
(cherry picked from commit 9fff868e39)
It seems that the intention was to format a number in base 8 (as
suggested by the %o format specifier), but `perms` is a `std::string`
and not a number. Looks like `rawMode` is the correct thing to use here.
(cherry picked from commit 1b5c8aac12)
It seems that the intention was to format a number in base 8 (as
suggested by the %o format specifier), but `perms` is a `std::string`
and not a number. Looks like `rawMode` is the correct thing to use here.
In the common case, nix develop is running against a dirty checkout of a project.
This patch removes the warning about a dirty tree on nix develop only.
Close FH-736
This name is close to the Nixpkgs lib function `escapeShellArg`,
making it easier to find.
A friendlier function with the same behavior as lib could be added
later.
Fixes
../src/libstore/unix/build/derivation-builder.cc:1130:86: warning: the compiler can assume that the address of ‘nix::DerivationBuilderParams::drv’ will never be NULL [-Waddress]
1130 | if (useChroot && settings.preBuildHook != "" && dynamic_cast<const Derivation *>(&drv)) {
| ^~~~
Assuming this check was left over from the time `drv` could be a
`BasicDerivation`.
