Before the change `nix` was stripping warning flags
reported by `gcc-14` too eagerly:
$ nix build -f. texinfo4
error: builder for '/nix/store/i9948l91s3df44ip5jlpp6imbrcs646x-texinfo-4.13a.drv' failed with exit code 2;
last 25 log lines:
> 1495 | info_tag (mbi_iterator_t iter, int handle, size_t *plen)
> | ~~~~~~~~^~~~
> window.c:1887:39: error: passing argument 4 of 'printed_representation' from incompatible pointer type []
> 1887 | &replen);
> | ^~~~~~~
> | |
> | int *
After the change the compiler flag remains:
$ ~/patched.nix build -f. texinfo4
error: builder for '/nix/store/i9948l91s3df44ip5jlpp6imbrcs646x-texinfo-4.13a.drv' failed with exit code 2;
last 25 log lines:
> 1495 | info_tag (mbi_iterator_t iter, int handle, size_t *plen)
> | ~~~~~~~~^~~~
> window.c:1887:39: error: passing argument 4 of 'printed_representation' from incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
> 1887 | &replen);
> | ^~~~~~~
> | |
> | int *
Note the difference in flag rendering around the warning.
https://gist.github.com/egmontkob/eb114294efbcd5adb1944c9f3cb5feda has a
good sumamry of why it happens. Befomre the change `nix` was handling
just one form or URL separator:
$ printf '\e]8;;http://example.com\e\\This is a link\e]8;;\e\\\n'
Now it also handled another for (used by gcc-14`):
printf '\e]8;;http://example.com\aThis is a link\e]8;;\a\n'
While at it fixed accumulation of trailing escape `\e\\` symbol.
sometimes it's these little things that let beginners stumble at the
first step...
mentioning one potentially foreign concept while introducing an entirely
new concept is asking enough already.
The explicit include is needed for clangd to not get confused somehow,
which is also what threw me off initially and made me pick the wrong
constructor.
The (pointer, number, number) constructor first constructs a C string
and then takes a substring from that, but we didn't specify that the
buffer needs to be NUL-terminated, and then what would be the point of
the size argument anyway...
basic_string.h:
> basic_string(const _Tp& __t, size_type __pos, size_type __n,
> const _Alloc& __a = _Alloc())
> : basic_string(_S_to_string_view(__t).substr(__pos, __n), __a) { }
Valgrind on nixops4/rust/nix-flake tests:
==1344422== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==1344422== at 0x48513E8: strlen (vg_replace_strmem.c:505)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (char_traits.h:391)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (string_view:141)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: UnknownInlinedFun (basic_string.h:790)
==1344422== by 0x488E941: nix_flake_reference_and_fragment_from_string (nix_api_flake.cc:81)
==1344422== by 0x127332: nix_flake::FlakeReference::parse_with_fragment (lib.rs:123)
Once again found by an automated migration to `std::format`.
I've tested that boost::format works fine with `std::string_view`
arguments.
(cherry picked from commit 9fff868e39)
