The simplification here is due to a long-standing bug, but it is not
worth fixing the bug at this time. Instead we've finally written up an
issue for the bug, and referenced the issue number in the code.
In the local building case, there is many things which can through
`BuildError`, but in the hook case there is just this one. We can
therefore simplify the code by "cinching" down the logic just to the
spot the error is thrown.
There is other code outside `libstore/build` which also uses
`BuildError`, but I believe those cases are mistakes. The point of
`BuildError` is the narrow technical use-cases of "errors which should
not be fatal with `--keep-going`". Using it outside the
building/scheduling code doesn't really make sense in that regard. It
seems likely that those usages were instead merely because "oh, this
error has something to do with building, so I guess `BuildError` is
better than `Error`".
It is quite likely that I myself used `BuildError` incorrectly as
described above :).
The variables are only set by CGroup mechanisms in `killSandbox` in the
local build. In the build hook case, these variables will not be set, so
there is nothing to do.
We can move this method from `LocalStore` to `Store` --- even if we only
want the actual builder to sign things in many cases, there is no reason
to try to enforce this policy by spurious moving the method to a
subclass.
Now, we might technically sign class, but CA derivations is
experimental, and @Ericson2314 is going to revisit all this stuff with
issue #11896 anyways.
- `chrootParentDir` can be a local variable instead of a class variable.
- `getChildStatus` can be inlined. Again, we have the `assert(!hook);`
in the local building case, which makes for a simpler thing inlined.
Thanks to the previous commit, we can inline all these small callbacks.
In the build-hook case, they were empty, and now they disappear
entirely.
While `LocalDerivationGoal` can be used in the hook case (we use it
based on whether we have a local store, not based on whether we are
using the build hook, a decision which comes later), the previous
commit's inline moved the code into a spot where we know we are cleaning
up after local building, *not* after running the build hook. This allows
for much more simplification.
The basic idea is that while we have duplicated this function, we now
have one call-site in the local build case, and one call site in the
build hook case. This unlocks big opportunities to specialize each copy,
since they really shouldn't be doing the same things. By the time we are
are done, there should not be much duplication left.
See #12628 for further info.
I refactored the way that input resolution works in `DerivationGoal`. To
be honest, it is probably unclear to the reader whether this new way is
better or worse. I suppose *intrinsic* motivation, I can say that
- the more structured use of `inputGoal` (a local variable) is better
than the shotgrun approach with `inputDrvOutputs`
- A virtual `waiteeDone` was a hack, and now it's gone.
However, the *real* motivation of this is not the above things, but that
it is needed for my mammoth refactor fixing #11897 and #11928.
It is nice that this step could come first, rather than making that
refactor even bigger.
The bug reappeared after all, and the fix introduced a different bug. I
just reverted on 2.27 first, in #12576, but upon further introspection
and discussion with @roberth, with preparing for and travelling to
Planet Nix I will not be able to fix it on `master` soon enough for a
revert to not be warranted here in the meantime also.
This reverts commit c98525235f.
This is a first step towards PR #10760, and the issues it addresses.
See the Doxygen for details.
Thanks to these changes, we are able to drastically restrict how the
rest of the code-base uses `ParseDerivation`.
Co-Authored-By: HaeNoe <git@haenoe.party>
I do not believe there is any problem with computing
`hashDerivationModulo` the normal way with impure derivations.
Conversely, the way this used to work is very suspicious because two
almost-equal derivations that only differ in depending on different
impure derivations could have the same drv hash modulo. That is very
suspicious because there is no reason to think those two different
impure derivations will end up producing the same content-addressed
data!
Co-authored-by: Alain Zscheile <zseri.devel@ytrizja.de>
"content-address*ed*" derivation is misleading because all derivations
are *themselves* content-addressed. What may or may not be
content-addressed is not derivation itself, but the *output* of the
derivation.
The outputs are not *part* of the derivation (for then the derivation
wouldn't be complete before we built it) but rather separate entities
produced by the derivation.
"content-adddress*ed*" is not correctly because it can only describe
what the derivation *is*, and that is not what we are trying to do.
"content-address*ing*" is correct because it describes what the
derivation *does* --- it produces content-addressed data.
This fixes dynamic derivations, reverting #9081.
I believe that this time around, #9052 is fixed. When I first rebased
this, tests were failing (which wasn't the case before). The cause of
those test failures were due to the crude job in which the outer goal
tried to exit with the inner goal's status.
Now, that error handling has been reworked to be more faithful. The exit
exit status and exception of the inner goal is returned by the outer
goal. The exception was what was causing the test failures, but I
believe it was not having the right error code (there is more than one
for failure) that caused #9081.
The only cost of doing things the "right way" was that I had to
introduce a hacky `preserveException` boolean. I don't like this, but,
then again, none of us like anything about how the scheduler works.
Issue #11927 is still there to clean everything up, subsuming the need
for any `preserveException` because I doubt we will be fishing
information out of state machines like this at all.
This reverts commit 8440afbed7.
Co-Authored-By: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
This gets rid of unnecessary copies in range-based-for loops and
local variables, when they are used solely as `const &`.
Also added a fixme comment about a suspicious move out of const,
which might not be intended.
Looks like some cruft has been left over from previous refactorings.
This removes dead variables, which should not have side effects in their
constructors. In cases where the variable initialization has a purpose
[[maybe_unused]] is inserted to silence compiler warnings.
In these trivial cases the final vector size (or lower bound on the size) is known,
so we can avoid some vector reallocations. This is not very important, but is just
good practice and general hygiene.
This broke in #11005. Any number of PathSubstitutionGoals would
be woken up by a single build slot becoming available. If there
are a lot of substitution goals active, this could lead to us
running out of file descriptors (especially on macOS where the
default limit is 256).
* Only build perl subproject on Linux
* Fix various Windows regressions
* Don't put the emulator hook in test builds
We run the tests in a separate derivation. Only need it for the dev shell.
* Fix native dev shells
* Fix cross dev shells we don't know how to emulate
Co-authored-by: PoweredByPie <poweredbypie@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Joachim Schiele <js@lastlog.de>
Co-authored-by: John Ericson <John.Ericson@Obsidian.Systems>
I don't think it's completely impossible, but I can't construct
one easily as derivationStrict seems to (re)tokenize the outputs
attribute, dropping the empty output.
It's not a scenario we have to account for here.