nixos/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git synced 2025-11-08 19:46:12 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

typos

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
zimbatm 2017-03-18 21:35:09 +00:00
parent 9830d2d792
commit 0b188c525e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md
View file

@ -78,12 +78,12 @@ At this point, the person submitting the RFC should find at least one "co-author
that will help them bring the RFC to completion. The goal is to improve the that will help them bring the RFC to completion. The goal is to improve the
chances that the RFC is both desired and likely to be implemented. chances that the RFC is both desired and likely to be implemented.
Once the author is happy with the state of the RFC, she/he should seek for Once the author is happy with the state of the RFC, they should seek for
wider community review by stating the readyness of the work. Advertisement on wider community review by stating the readyness of the work. Advertisement on
the mailing-list and IRC is an acceptable way of doing that. the mailing-list and IRC is an acceptable way of doing that.
After a number of rounds of review the discussion should settle and a general After a number of rounds of review the discussion should settle and a general
consensus should emerge. This bit is left intentionnaly vague and should be consensus should emerge. This bit is left intentionally vague and should be
refined in the future. We don't have a technical commitee so controversial refined in the future. We don't have a technical commitee so controversial
changes will be rejected by default. changes will be rejected by default.
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ If a RFC is rejected, whoever merges the RFC should do the following:
## Role of the "co-author" ## Role of the "co-author"
To goal for assigning a "co-author" is to help move the RFC along. The goal for assigning a "co-author" is to help move the RFC along.
The co-author should: The co-author should:
* be available for discussion with the main author * be available for discussion with the main author