nixos/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git synced 2025-12-03 07:31:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Rename buddy to co-author

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
zimbatm 2017-03-01 15:13:48 +00:00
parent 48e3cefc04
commit 2d315c6cc2
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md
View file

@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ the design from the larger community.
are much more likely to make progress than those that don't receive any are much more likely to make progress than those that don't receive any
comments. comments.
At this point, the person submitting the RFC should find at least one "buddy" At this point, the person submitting the RFC should find at least one "co-author"
that will help them bring the RFC to reality. The goal is to improve the that will help them bring the RFC to completion. The goal is to improve the
chances that the RFC is both desired and likely to be implemented. chances that the RFC is both desired and likely to be implemented.
Whomever merges the RFC should do the following: Whomever merges the RFC should do the following:
@ -93,12 +93,12 @@ rubber stamp, and in particular still does not mean the feature will
ultimately be merged; it does mean that in principle all the major ultimately be merged; it does mean that in principle all the major
stakeholders have agreed to the feature and are amenable to merging it. stakeholders have agreed to the feature and are amenable to merging it.
### Role of the "buddy" ### Role of the "co-author"
To goal for assigning a "buddy" to the RFC is multifold. The main To goal for assigning a "co-author" to the RFC is multifold. The main
responsability is to make themselves available for to the author to move the RFC responsability is to make themselves available for to the author to move the RFC
along. It means keep a closer connection with them, talk and help resolve along. It means keep a closer connection with them, talk and help resolve
ongoing issues and add credence to the proposal. The buddy doesn't necessarily ongoing issues and add credence to the proposal. The co-author doesn't necessarily
have to agree with all the points of the RFC but should generally be satisfied have to agree with all the points of the RFC but should generally be satisfied
that the proposed additions are a good thing for the community. that the proposed additions are a good thing for the community.