mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git
synced 2025-12-18 23:11:19 +01:00
Clarify the role of the co-author
This commit is contained in:
parent
d70b98a9b1
commit
3972bd9064
1 changed files with 12 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -88,14 +88,19 @@ rubber stamp, and in particular still does not mean the feature will
|
|||
ultimately be merged; it does mean that in principle all the major
|
||||
stakeholders have agreed to the feature and are amenable to merging it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Role of the "co-author"
|
||||
## Role of the "co-author"
|
||||
|
||||
To goal for assigning a "co-author" to the RFC is multifold. The main
|
||||
responsability is to make themselves available for to the author to move the RFC
|
||||
along. It means keep a closer connection with them, talk and help resolve
|
||||
ongoing issues and add credence to the proposal. The co-author doesn't necessarily
|
||||
have to agree with all the points of the RFC but should generally be satisfied
|
||||
that the proposed additions are a good thing for the community.
|
||||
To goal for assigning a "co-author" is to help move the RFC along.
|
||||
|
||||
The co-author should:
|
||||
* be available for discussion with the main author
|
||||
* respond to inquiries in a timely manner
|
||||
* help with fixing minor issues like typos so community discussion can stay
|
||||
on design issues
|
||||
|
||||
The co-author doesn't necessarily have to agree with all the points of the RFC
|
||||
but should generally be satisfied that the proposed additions are a good thing
|
||||
for the community.
|
||||
|
||||
# Drawbacks
|
||||
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue