mirror of
https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git
synced 2025-12-16 14:01:15 +01:00
0149-cache-key-rotation: add some alternatives
This commit is contained in:
parent
7681874854
commit
407a35e6e9
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ Why should we *not* do this?
|
||||||
# Alternatives
|
# Alternatives
|
||||||
[alternatives]: #alternatives
|
[alternatives]: #alternatives
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
What other designs have been considered? What is the impact of not doing this?
|
- change nothing, obviously
|
||||||
|
- also resign old `*.narinfo`. Maybe it's not too hard.
|
||||||
|
It would help people wanting ot use old builds.
|
||||||
|
- double-sign `*.narinfo` for some time. (also not an exclusive alternative)
|
||||||
|
I don't know if consumers support multiple signatures.
|
||||||
|
It doesn't seem to give us significant advantage though;
|
||||||
|
acceptance of multiple keys seems more advantageous.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Unresolved questions
|
# Unresolved questions
|
||||||
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions
|
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue