reorder arguments against nuking

This commit is contained in:
Anderson Torres 2023-05-11 23:26:11 -03:00
parent 004fc01b75
commit 6289abed80

View file

@ -212,17 +212,14 @@ The most immediate drawbacks are:
- The categorization is already present; this RFC proposes to expose it to a - The categorization is already present; this RFC proposes to expose it to a
higher level, in a more discoverable, structured format. higher level, in a more discoverable, structured format.
- Categorization is very traditional among software collections. Many of them
are doing this just fine for years on end, and we can easily imitate them -
and even better, given we have Nix language machinery available.
- A well-made categorization is useful for specialized search engines,
adding a new field for narrowing searches.
- The complete removal of categorization is too harsh. A solution that keeps - The complete removal of categorization is too harsh. A solution that keeps
and enhances the categorization is way more preferrable than one that nukes and enhances the categorization is way more preferrable than one that nukes
it completely. it completely.
- Categorization is very traditional among software collections. Many of them
are doing this just fine for years on end, and Nixpkgs can imitate them
easily - and even better, given we have Nix language machinery available.
# Unresolved questions # Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions [unresolved]: #unresolved-questions