From 84657e08009d789629af6d4549a65e7dc24d4684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: zimbatm <zimbatm@zimbatm.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:57:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify unresolved questions

---
 rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md b/rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md
index 02d1b65..c1b5e2c 100644
--- a/rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md
+++ b/rfcs/0000-rfc-process.md
@@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ inspiration.
 # Unresolved questions
 [unresolved]: #unresolved-questions
 
+To be solved in the future:
+
 1. Does this RFC strike a favorable balance between formality and agility?
 2. Does this RFC successfully address the aforementioned issues with the current
    informal RFC process?