From a18c24a55e08275fa92c161f1910d033cecb349e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anderson Torres Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 14:29:38 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] A section for the team --- rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md b/rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md index 029cd76..17e1308 100755 --- a/rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md +++ b/rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md @@ -264,10 +264,15 @@ Still unsolved is what data structure is better suited to represent a category. # Future work [future]: #future-work +## Categorization Team +[categorization-team]: #categorization-team + Given the typical complexities that arise from categorization, and expecting -that regular maintainers are not expected to understand its minuteness, it is -strongly recommended the creation of a team entrusted to manage issues related -to categorization, including but not limited to: +that regular maintainers are not expected to understand its minuteness +(according to the experience from [Debtags +Team](https://wiki.debian.org/Debtags/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_ask_the_maintainers_to_tag_their_own_packages.3F)), +it is strongly recommended the creation of a team entrusted to manage issues +related to categorization, including but not limited to: - Update documentation. - Curate the categories.