From cac0cbb1564ef1abc23767eb2196de0c8ce3f6d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Doron Behar Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:15:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Better explain Nixpkgs issue #86369 --- rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md b/rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md index 17e9f55..a2d698a 100644 --- a/rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md +++ b/rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md @@ -116,14 +116,9 @@ wrappings will become a problem of the past. - [issue 86369](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/86369) -@ttuegel I get the sense [you support this idea of declarative -wrappers](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/86369#issuecomment-626732191). -For anyone else interested in a summary, the issue is a bit complex, so once -you'll read the design of this RFC, and see examples of what the POC -implementation of declarative wrappers [is capable -of](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/85103#issuecomment-614195666), I hope -you'll see how declarative wrappers will solve this issue. - +@ttuegel with declarative wrappers, we can symlink all qt plugins into 1 +directory and wrap the executable with only 1 `QT_PLUGIN_PATH` in their +environment, which should decrease the plugin load of every qt package. ## Issues _possibly_ fixable by declarative wrappers (?)