diff --git a/rfcs/0110-inherit-as-list.md b/rfcs/0110-inherit-as-list.md index 415a11f..492b321 100644 --- a/rfcs/0110-inherit-as-list.md +++ b/rfcs/0110-inherit-as-list.md @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ new syntax would cause a syntax error. | `inherit (attrs) [ a b c ]` | Initial draft | ["confusing that for attribute sets, the inherit keyword is on the inside but here it is on the outside" -jtojnar](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r730527443) | | `[ inherit (attrs) a b c; ]` | 2nd draft, [proposed by jtojnar](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r730527443) | ["not very happy with reusing inherit here. If I read inherit I read 'right, an attribute-set'." -Ma27](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-947517675)
["There currently is no separator in lists, and this would add that." -Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-959114390) | | `attrs.[a b c]` | 3rd (current) draft, [proposed by Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-959114390) | Has ["ambiguities [...] which would have to be worked out" -Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-971760508)
["what `[a b c]` means depends on if it is after `attrs.`" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933500003)
Needs care to limit scope of this rule, currently limited to single-identifier case (discussions [here](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r1001737515) and [here](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r1013099694)) | -| `[ with attrs | a b c ]` | [Proposed by nrdxp](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933570815) | ["Looks more foreign", "may also cause confusion with other languages" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r934516433)
["introduces a small inconsistency" vs attribute-set `inherit` -rehno-lindeque](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r973033159) | +| `[ with attrs \| a b c ]` | [Proposed by nrdxp](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933570815) | ["Looks more foreign", "may also cause confusion with other languages" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r934516433)
["introduces a small inconsistency" vs attribute-set `inherit` -rehno-lindeque](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r973033159) | | Exclusive `with`, `let with` | [Proposed by infinisil](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1319338335) and [later refined](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1319338335) | Requires some dynamic behavior to fully replace `with`, including nested usage [-oxalica](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1334537982), [-infinisil](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1334593541)
May change semantics of existing Nix code | Some common threads here are the desire to introduce a syntax form which