nixos/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git synced 2025-11-09 03:56:11 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Section for code implementation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Anderson Torres 2024-05-24 16:45:54 -03:00
parent f771094f0a
commit eb079f667c
1 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
rfcs/0146-meta-categories.md
View file

@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ the above mess: new `meta` attributes.
# Detailed design # Detailed design
[design]: #detailed-design [design]: #detailed-design
## Code Implementation
[code-implementation]: #code-implementation
A new attribute, `meta.categories`, will be included for every Nix expression A new attribute, `meta.categories`, will be included for every Nix expression
living inside Nixpkgs. living inside Nixpkgs.
@ -258,9 +261,15 @@ found are listed below (linked at [references section](#references)):
# Unresolved questions # Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions [unresolved]: #unresolved-questions
Still unsolved is what data structure is better suited to represent a category. There are some still unsolved issues:
- For now we stick to a set `{ name, description }`. - What data structure is suitable to represent a category?
- For now we stick to the most natural: a set `{ name, description }`.
- Should we have a set of primary, "most important" categories with mandatory
status, in the sense each package should set at least one of them?
- The answer is most certainly positive.
# Future work # Future work
[future]: #future-work [future]: #future-work