nixos/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git synced 2025-12-20 07:51:18 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Remove out scope Nixpkgs issue #32790 from motivation

Browse source 
Switching to a separate wrapper derivation for every package that uses
GLib is a bloat, as discussed in the RFC meeting.
This commit is contained in:
Doron Behar 2021-02-24 16:50:19 +02:00
parent 60d3825fdd
commit f3416a00a6
1 changed files with 0 additions and 13 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
rfcs/0075-declarative-wrappers.md
View file

@ -55,19 +55,6 @@ there is simply not a better or reasonable alternative available.
We have numerous issues regarding wrappers and our wrapper shell hooks. Here's
a list of them, sorted to categories.
## Closure related
- [issue 95027](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/95027)
@jtojnar & @yegortimoshenko How
hard would it be to test all of our wrapped `gobject-introspection` using
packages that the equivalent, `GI_GIR_PATH` environment should work? If our
wrappers were declarative, and they were a separate derivation, at least we
wouldn't have to rebuild tons of packages to do so - we'd have to rebuild only
the wrappers. Plus, since all of the environment is available to us via
`builtins.toJSON`, it should be possible to write a script that will compare
the environments to make the transition easier to review.
## Missing environment
- [pull 83321](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/83321)