nixos/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs.git synced 2025-11-08 19:46:12 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Escape vertical bar character in table markdown

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Ryan Burns 2023-06-11 16:03:50 -07:00
parent d67d4422bf
commit d86951436b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
rfcs/0110-inherit-as-list.md
View file

@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ new syntax would cause a syntax error.
| `inherit (attrs) [ a b c ]` | Initial draft | ["confusing that for attribute sets, the inherit keyword is on the inside but here it is on the outside" -jtojnar](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r730527443) |
| `[ inherit (attrs) a b c; ]` | 2nd draft, [proposed by jtojnar](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r730527443) | ["not very happy with reusing inherit here. If I read inherit I read 'right, an attribute-set'." -Ma27](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-947517675) <br /> ["There currently is no separator in lists, and this would add that." -Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-959114390) |
| `attrs.[a b c]` | 3rd (current) draft, [proposed by Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-959114390) | Has ["ambiguities [...] which would have to be worked out" -Synthetica9](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-971760508) <br /> ["what `[a b c]` means depends on if it is after `attrs.`" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933500003) <br /> Needs care to limit scope of this rule, currently limited to single-identifier case (discussions [here](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r1001737515) and [here](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r1013099694)) |
| `[ with attrs | a b c ]` | [Proposed by nrdxp](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933570815) | ["Looks more foreign", "may also cause confusion with other languages" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r934516433) <br /> ["introduces a small inconsistency" vs attribute-set `inherit` -rehno-lindeque](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r973033159) |
| `[ with attrs \| a b c ]` | [Proposed by nrdxp](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r933570815) | ["Looks more foreign", "may also cause confusion with other languages" -kevincox](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r934516433) <br /> ["introduces a small inconsistency" vs attribute-set `inherit` -rehno-lindeque](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#discussion_r973033159) |
| Exclusive `with`, `let with` | [Proposed by infinisil](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1319338335) and [later refined](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1319338335) | Requires some dynamic behavior to fully replace `with`, including nested usage [-oxalica](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1334537982), [-infinisil](https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/110#issuecomment-1334593541) <br /> May change semantics of existing Nix code |
Some common threads here are the desire to introduce a syntax form which