this is unrelated to the proposal, as the version declaration is only
relevant for parsing, and would cover all use cases of `langVersion` if
we have minor version numbers
prefer the special syntax approach, based on the arguments that all
other alternatives would defeat the purpose of guaranteeing predictable
results, which this proposal values higher than forward compatibility.
* Initial nixos container commit because I want to view diffs between changes
* Updates / Improvements
* Note regarding static networking
* Updates
* update
* Update.
* Update.
* Update
Thanks Linus for the proof-read :)
* Update.
Mention that nixops container backend is also affected as pointed out by
fpletz.
* fixup! wording, spelling
* Move document according to assigned RFC number
* Linkify related issues
As it's done in https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/blob/master/rfcs/0004-replace-unicode-quotes.md
* Bind-mounting Nix state isn't strictly needed
It's sufficient to have the store-paths available.
* Wording
Co-authored-by: Kevin Cox <kevincox@kevincox.ca>
* Clarify "default mode", remove a few unnecessary implementation details
* rfc108: add shepherds
Co-authored-by: Jörg Thalheim <Mic92@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply wording suggestions from @lheckemann
Co-authored-by: Linus Heckemann <git@sphalerite.org>
* Usage of `nsenter` to update a container's configuration is not relevant for the RFC
* Rename `config` to `system-config` to avoid ambiguities in the module system
* Explicitly talk about deprecation of current implementation
Co-authored-by: Erik Arvstedt <erik.arvstedt@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Cox <kevincox@kevincox.ca>
Co-authored-by: Jörg Thalheim <Mic92@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Linus Heckemann <git@sphalerite.org>
* Initial draft "ret-cont" recursive Nix
* Fix typos and finish trailing sentance
* Switch to advocating temp store rather than daemon socket
Also:
- Allow fixed output builds (in that temp store)
- Clean up drawbacks and alternatives.
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Fix typo
Thanks @siddharthist!
Co-Authored-By: Ericson2314 <git@JohnEricson.me>
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Fix typo
Thanks @Mic92
Co-Authored-By: Ericson2314 <git@JohnEricson.me>
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Fix typo
Thanks @globin
Co-Authored-By: Ericson2314 <git@JohnEricson.me>
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Fix typo
Thanks @siddharthist!
Co-Authored-By: Ericson2314 <git@JohnEricson.me>
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Clean up motivation, adding examples
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Improve syntax highlighting
* Do a lousy job formalizing the detailed design
Break off some previously inline observations into their own subsection.
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Mention `builtins.exec` in alternatives
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Fix typo
Thanks @Mic92!
Co-Authored-By: Ericson2314 <git@JohnEricson.me>
* ret-cont-recursive-nix: Remove dangling "$o"
The later examples with `nix-instantiate` automatically get all the outputs of the final rewritten drv, so there's no output iteration needed. `"$o"` was mistakenly copied over from the earlier examples.
Thanks to @ocharles for asking me the question that led me to this. Hopefully this change answers that?
* Update rfcs/0000-ret-cont-recursive-nix.md
Co-Authored-By: Domen Kožar <domen@enlambda.com>
* ret-cont-recursive: Fix typo
about -> out
* ret-cont: Add examples and expand future work
* ret-cont: Fix syntax error
No `let`, so don't need `in`.
* ret-cont: Mention Ninja's upcomming `dyndep` and C++ oppertunity
* ret-cont: Fix missing explicit `outputs` and `__recursive`
This was in the "wrapper" derivation example.
* ret-cont: "caching builds" -> "caching evaluation"
We already cache builds just fine, thanks!
Thanks @globin for catching
* ret-cont: Improve formalism and reference #62
* drv-build-drv: Start drafting from old ret-cont-recursive-nix RFC
* drv-buiild-drv: WIP rewrite
* plan-dynamism: Rewrite RFC yet again
* plan-dynamism: Rename file accordingly
* plan-dynanism: Fix typo
Thanks @mweinelt.
* plan-dynanism: Fix formalism slightly
* Apply suggestions from code review
Thanks!
Co-authored-by: Rosario Pulella <Rosariopulella@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ninjatrappeur <NinjaTrappeur@users.noreply.github.com>
* plan-dynamism: `Buildables` -> `DerivedPathsWithHints`
Thanks @sternenseemann for catching.
* plan-dynamism: Add semantics and examples for `!` syntax
* plan-dynamism: Too many dashes in `--derivation`
* plan-dynanism: Put pupose of text hashing before name
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ollie Charles <ollie@ocharles.org.uk>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Ollie Charles <ollie@ocharles.org.uk>
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Update rfcs/0000-plan-dynanism.md
* plan-dynanism: Fix bad sentence
Thanks @roberth!
* plan-dynamism: Number the two parts
* plan-dynamism: Rip out part 2
There is more to do I'm sure, but I wanted to get the ball rolling.
* plan-dynamism: New motivation
* plan-dynamism: Fix typo
Thanks @L-as
* TEMP PLES AMEND
* [RFC 0092] Rename file
* [RFC 0092] Fix YAML header
* [RFC 0092] Rewrite summary
* [RFC 0092] Add link to documentation
* [RFC 0092] Rewrite example section
* [RFC 0092] Small fix
* [RFC 0092] Rewrite drawbacks and alternatives
* [RFC 0092] Improve alternatives section
* [RFC 0092] Fix syntax error
* [RFC 0092] Small change
* [RFC 0092] Remove unnecessary file
* [RFC 0092] Add comment about IFD
* [RFC 0092] Fix typo
* Update rfcs/0092-plan-dynamism.md
Co-authored-by: Jörg Thalheim <Mic92@users.noreply.github.com>
* plan-dynamism-experiment: Make clear is experimental
* plan-dynamism-experiment: Fix typo
Thanks @L-as
Co-authored-by: Langston Barrett <langston.barrett@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jörg Thalheim <Mic92@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robin Gloster <mail@glob.in>
Co-authored-by: Domen Kožar <domen@enlambda.com>
Co-authored-by: Rosario Pulella <Rosariopulella@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ninjatrappeur <NinjaTrappeur@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ollie Charles <ollie@ocharles.org.uk>
Co-authored-by: Las Safin <me@las.rs>
Co-authored-by: Eelco Dolstra <edolstra@gmail.com>
